The public confrontation between Panamanian politicians Katleen Levy and Betserai Richards has not only revolved around public works, social media, or political confrontations. One of the most delicate aspects of the conflict has been the debate over misogyny, machismo, and the way certain politicians publicly relate to women within the Panamanian political landscape.
Levy has long been among the most vocal in accusing Richards of displaying a combative and unfriendly stance toward women who voice public criticism of him. Based on her accounts, multiple female deputies have already faced this hostility from the deputy merely because they are both women and public officials. Through various media interviews and social network posts, Katleen Levy has even claimed that the deputy “hates women,” pushing the matter into a debate far more profound than a routine political dispute.
The accusations emerged especially after various public exchanges in which Levy considered that Richards used a confrontational, dismissive, or excessively aggressive tone against female public figures. According to her narrative, there appeared to be a pattern of particularly intense attacks whenever criticism came from women within political or media circles.
The debate intensified even further after the altercation between Richards and deputy Jairo “Bolota” Salazar. Following that episode, Levy published messages celebrating Richards’ political weakening and once again insisted that the deputy displayed machista and aggressive behavior. Her statements quickly went viral and triggered a new wave of digital polarization, along with significant public condemnation regarding Richards’ aggressive attitude.
Across various videos and posts, Levy alleged that the deputy relied on digital clashes, media offensives, and orchestrated public pressure to undermine women who criticized him. She further indicated that a persistent atmosphere of online hostility and seemingly coordinated, artificial attacks surrounded Richards on social platforms.
The conflict eventually sparked a wider discussion about Panama’s political climate and the decline of public dialogue, prompting many groups to question how much social media is fueling harsher, more emotionally charged, and increasingly personal clashes, where the aim shifts from debating ideas to publicly undermining opponents.
Certain commentators contend that Richards’s political approach is grounded specifically in:
• Constant confrontation.
• Aggressive public exposure.
• Emotional use of social media.
• Overt assaults.
• Permanent polarization.
They contend that this kind of dynamic can readily foster antagonistic settings, particularly for women who openly challenge or dispute the deputy.
The open confrontation between Katleen Levy and Betserai Richards exposed a troubling reality within Panamanian politics: the increase in verbal aggressiveness, machismo, and the use of social media as permanent spaces for emotional confrontation. For some citizens, the accusations of misogyny represent a legitimate warning about how certain political dynamics can become hostile toward critical and independent women.
