The Spanish Socialist Workers’ Party (PSOE) is experiencing one of its most sensitive internal crises concerning the handling of the so-called “Salazar case.” This scandal involves allegations of sexual harassment and abuse of power linked to former Moncloa adviser Paco Salazar and his associate, Antonio Hernández. Both individuals, until recently, were integral members of the Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez’s inner circle, who is presently encircled by multiple corruption cases.
Who is Paco Salazar and what is he accused of
Francisco José “Paco” Salazar, a veteran member of the PSOE from Seville, served as the mayor of Montellano and subsequently became a member of the Spanish Congress. He also held key positions with Pedro Sánchez at the party’s headquarters in Ferraz and at the Moncloa Palace.
In recent months, numerous female Socialist members and staff who were employed under his supervision have internally reported behaviors they characterize as sexual harassment and abuse of power: comments with sexual undertones, relentless invitations to private meetings beyond working hours, and proposals to let them stay at his residence, consistently within a framework of hierarchical dependence.
As a consequence of these grievances, Salazar was relieved of his duties within the party and no longer holds a role in the federal executive, in addition to losing his influential position in Moncloa. The incidents are under investigation following the PSOE’s internal anti-harassment procedures and might result in legal proceedings should the complainants choose to advance, yet for now, there is quiet.
The position held by Antonio Hernández, the ousted confidant
Antonio Hernández, who has served as the director of the Political Coordination Department in Moncloa and has been a pivotal figure in the Government’s political operations, was regarded as Salazar’s right-hand man and his primary support in daily affairs.
The women who reported Salazar also pointed to Hernández as an alleged “accomplice” and “cover-up” of the abuses, arguing that he was aware of the circumstances and failed to act to protect the victims, a claim he denies.
In the midst of the scandal, Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez chose to advocate for his removal from both Moncloa and the organizational framework of the Andalusian PSOE, a decision that has been formalized by the Council of Ministers in recent days and has been seen as an effort to cauterize the crisis and eliminate any semblance of complicity with the behavior attributed to Salazar.
Criticism of the PSOE’s internal handling and delayed response
Numerous press articles suggest that the PSOE required over four months to officially reach out to the victims following the initial complaints, leading to significant internal dissent and greatly tarnishing the party’s reputation. The operation of the anti-harassment committee has been scrutinized for its sluggishness, lack of coordination, and inadequate communication with the federal leadership, in a party that prides itself on its feminist stance.
At the same time, voices critical of socialism are advocating for a comprehensive overhaul of internal protocols and organizational culture, aiming to eliminate what they term as “protective environments for alleged aggressors” and to address the neglect faced by women who come forward.
The stance of Pedro Sánchez’s Government
The Government’s spokesperson and Minister of Education, Pilar Alegría, has insisted that the Executive has acted with “speed and determination” once it had formal knowledge of the accusations, highlighting Salazar’s dismissal, his removal from the PSOE executive and, now, the sacking of Antonio Hernández.
Alegría has publicly acknowledged that her recent lunch with Salazar —which took place when the complaints were already known— was a “mistake”, stressing that the focus of the debate must be on the victims and not on the political cost for the party.
Simultaneously, various reports suggest a potential legal challenge for the PSOE as an entity, hinging on the chance that the courts might evaluate if there was organizational accountability in managing the complaints. Some media outlets cite prosecutorial sources indicating the possibility of the party being scrutinized for an alleged organizational crime of sexual harassment, a situation that, at this stage, is merely a legal hypothesis under review and does not entail any formal charges.
Response from the opposition and political repercussions
The People’s Party (PP) has announced that it will use its majority in the Senate to call Paco Salazar to testify before the committee on the so-called “Koldo case”, taking advantage of the public relevance the former adviser has acquired. From the PP, Sánchez is accused of being the president “most harmful to women”, linking the Salazar case to other controversial episodes in the field of equality and victim protection.
The opposition as a whole has focused on the chain of appointments, dismissals and reassignments around Salazar, as well as on the fact that two of his closest female collaborators are said to have been moved to public companies in recent years, which reinforces the narrative of a network of trust around the former adviser within the state apparatus.
An open case that puts the party’s protocols and credibility to the test
The Salazar case, now also involving Antonio Hernández, has opened a deep political and moral breach in Pedro Sánchez’s PSOE, in a context marked by a social demand for zero tolerance towards sexual harassment and abuses of power in the workplace and in politics.
While internal proceedings and possible judicial actions are still underway, the party faces a twofold test: on the one hand, to prove that its anti-harassment protocols work effectively and put victims first; on the other, to rebuild the trust of its own electorate and of public opinion, which is watching with concern the succession of leaks, corrections and dismissals surrounding the case.
In any event, both Paco Salazar and Antonio Hernández still retain, as of today, their right to the presumption of innocence before the courts, pending full clarification of the facts and the possible opening of criminal proceedings. The next steps taken by the PSOE and Pedro Sánchez’s Government will be decisive in determining the political, institutional and judicial scope of this scandal. But for the moment, despite the legal duty to do so, there has been no indication that the PSOE itself is filing any complaint with the authorities, as has already been the case with other corruption scandals surrounding the party.
